As Election Day draws near, the debate surrounding the 29 Road and I-70 Interchange Ballot Issue intensifies. On October 15, the opposition group “No on 29 Road Debt” held an open house at the Fruita Community Center to voice their concerns and educate the public about the potential implications of the project.
Cost Concerns Take Center Stage
One of the primary issues raised during the open house was the projected cost of the project, which is expected to exceed $80 million. John Traylor, a spokesperson for the opposition group, emphasized that the financial burden could escalate further if the proponents seek approval from the state Department of Transportation.
- Key Points on Cost:
- Projected Cost: Over $80 million
- Potential for Increased Expenses: Approval from state authorities could raise costs
Traylor’s remarks highlight a significant concern among residents regarding the financial implications of the project. He argued that the community should be wary of the long-term costs associated with the proposed improvements. In contrast, Mesa County Commissioner Cody Davis offered a different perspective, suggesting that delaying the project would only lead to higher expenses in the future.
Traffic Safety and Design Issues
Another critical topic discussed at the open house was the anticipated increase in traffic and its potential impact on safety. Traylor pointed out that traffic congestion on Patterson Road and 29 Road is already problematic, leading to a rise in accidents and fatalities. He expressed concerns about the design of the interchange and its ability to handle increased traffic volume.
- Traffic Safety Concerns:
- Increased Traffic Volume: Expected to worsen existing congestion
- Accident Rates: Concerns about rising incidents and fatalities
Commissioner Davis countered these claims by stating that while the volume of traffic may increase, the overall percentage of serious accidents is likely to decrease. He argued that improvements to the interchange would enhance safety, despite the higher number of vehicles on the road. This back-and-forth highlights the differing views on how the project will affect community safety.
Educating the Community on Local Issues
As the election approaches, both Traylor and Davis stressed the importance of community education regarding local ballot issues. Traylor encouraged residents to utilize the county’s informational resources, such as the white booklet mailed to voters, which outlines details about the ballot initiatives, including the 29 Road proposal.
- Advice for Voters:
- Utilize County Resources: Check the informational booklet for details on ballot initiatives
- Focus on Local Issues: Davis advised voters to prioritize local matters, as they have a more direct impact on their lives
Davis noted that there are 16 state issues and four local issues on the ballot in Mesa County. He urged voters to consider local initiatives carefully, as they often have more immediate effects on the community compared to state-level decisions.
