“We Need to Follow the Law”: Colorado Rep. Jeff Hurd Weighs in on Immigration, ICE Raids, and Protests

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. – Amid a wave of nationwide protests against recent immigration enforcement actions, U.S. Representative Jeff Hurd reaffirmed his support for the rule of law and the removal of individuals in the U.S. illegally—particularly those with criminal records.

“This isn’t a Republican issue or a Democratic issue,” said Hurd. “This is about economic security, national security, and following the law.”

Hurd, who represents Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, which includes Mesa County, made the remarks as the Department of Homeland Security confirmed it would continue Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations despite opposition in cities across the U.S.

Focus on Criminal Offenders

The congressman emphasized that federal immigration enforcement should focus primarily on individuals illegally residing in the U.S. who have committed additional crimes.

“Being here illegally is a violation of federal law,” Hurd said. “But we’ve seen a focus on those who have committed further criminal acts, and that’s where resources should be targeted.”

His remarks come just days after protesters rallied in Grand Junction and other parts of the country, condemning ICE raids and deportations.

Jeff Hurd Colorado ICE protests 2025

Border Security Still Felt in Western Colorado

Although far from the southern border, Hurd said Colorado’s Western Slope is not insulated from the effects of illegal immigration, particularly in terms of drug trafficking and organized crime.

“One of the things we campaigned on was securing the border and keeping our communities safe,” he said. “Drug cartels are making billions by smuggling both people and drugs across the border, and that affects not only border states, but counties like Mesa, Delta, Montrose, and Pueblo as well.”

Peaceful Protest Supported, Violence Condemned

Hurd also addressed recent demonstrations, reiterating his support for the First Amendment right to peaceful protest—but drawing a sharp line between lawful demonstrations and public disorder.

“There’s a difference between protesting peacefully and what we’re seeing in places like Los Angeles,” he said. “When protests cross into violence, chaos, and destruction, it’s appropriate for the federal government to step in.”

“Law and order is something that matters to all of us as Americans,” he continued. “We must support peaceful expression of views, but when that becomes lawlessness or anarchy, law enforcement needs the tools and support to respond.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *