The trial of Patrick Egan, a former Marine veteran accused of assaulting a local television reporter in Grand Junction, Colorado, entered its second day on January 6, 2026, with opening statements and witness testimonies shedding light on the December 2024 incident. Prosecutors presented video evidence showing Egan allegedly following the reporter for 40 miles before attacking him in a parking lot, while the defense argued that medication side effects clouded Egan’s judgment.

Opening Statements Set the Stage

Prosecutors kicked off the day by showing dash cam footage from Egan’s vehicle, where he worked as a driver for Sunshine Rides at the time. The video captured Egan shouting questions about the reporter’s citizenship and making threats.

The defense countered by pointing to Egan’s medical history. They claimed he took Benadryl for jaw pain, which led to confusion and erratic behavior. This argument aims to show the attack was not intentional but a result of health issues.

Courtroom observers noted the tension as both sides laid out their cases. The prosecution emphasized racial motives, based on Egan’s alleged slurs, while the defense focused on mental health factors.

Key Witness Testimonies Emerge

The reporter, Ja’Ronn Alex, who is a Pacific Islander and U.S. citizen, took the stand to recount the terrifying ordeal. He described being followed from a gas station, then tackled and strangled outside the KKCO-KJCT newsroom.

Five other witnesses testified, including a former colleague who saw the struggle and called for help. An operations manager from Sunshine Rides provided details on Egan’s employment and behavior leading up to the event.

These accounts painted a vivid picture of the chaos. One witness mentioned hearing Egan yell about “Trump’s America,” linking the incident to broader political tensions.

Prosecutors used body cam and security footage to support the claims. The defense questioned the witnesses on Egan’s state of mind, suggesting his actions stemmed from a bad reaction to medicine rather than malice.

Background of the 2024 Incident

The assault happened on December 27, 2024, after Egan reportedly confronted Alex at a convenience store. Police reports state Egan demanded proof of citizenship and followed Alex’s car for about 40 miles.

Upon arrival at the station, Egan allegedly exited his vehicle, grabbed Alex, and applied pressure to his neck. Co-workers intervened, preventing further harm.

Egan faces charges of second-degree assault, harassment, and bias-motivated crimes. If convicted, he could serve up to six years in prison, according to Colorado law.

This case has drawn attention due to its timing, just weeks after the 2024 presidential election. Similar incidents of harassment rose by 15 percent nationwide in late 2024, per FBI data, often tied to heated political rhetoric.

Defense Claims Mental Health and Medication Issues

Egan’s legal team highlighted his history of mental illness, including PTSD from his Marine service. They presented medical records showing prescriptions for pain and allergies.

A key point was the “medical hysteria” defense, arguing Benadryl caused delirium. Experts note that high doses can lead to confusion, with studies from the Mayo Clinic indicating such reactions in about 10 percent of users.

The strategy seeks to reduce charges by proving lack of intent. Prosecutors challenged this, saying Egan’s words showed clear prejudice.

To illustrate potential side effects, consider common reactions to Benadryl:

• Drowsiness and confusion
• Hallucinations in severe cases
• Agitation or aggressive behavior

This defense echoes other cases, like a 2025 trial in Denver where medication influenced a verdict.

Recent Developments and Violations

In December 2025, Egan was arrested again for violating a protection order. He allegedly contacted two former co-workers, who were set to testify.

This breach led to additional charges and raised questions about his compliance. Court documents show Egan posted bail but remains under strict conditions.

The incident delayed the trial slightly, but jury selection wrapped up on January 5, 2026. With 12 jurors and two alternates, the case moved forward swiftly.

Broader Implications for Journalism Safety

This trial highlights growing risks for journalists. A 2025 report from the Committee to Protect Journalists noted a 20 percent increase in assaults on media workers in the U.S.

In Colorado alone, three similar incidents occurred in 2025, prompting calls for better protections. Local news outlets have since implemented safety training.

The case also ties into national discussions on bias crimes. Advocacy groups like the ACLU have monitored it, urging accountability.

Here’s a timeline of key events in the Patrick Egan case:

This overview shows the progression from incident to courtroom.

As the trial proceeds into day three on January 7, 2026, more evidence and closing arguments are expected. The outcome could set precedents for handling bias-motivated attacks.

What do you think about the defense’s medication argument? Share your thoughts in the comments and spread the word by sharing this article with others interested in justice and media safety.