AG Office Pushes Back on Clemency Attempt for Joseph Corcoran Ahead of Scheduled Execution

FORT WAYNE, Ind. – In a contentious legal battle, the Indiana Attorney General’s Office has reiterated its stance that Joseph Corcoran, convicted of a 1997 quadruple murder, should face the death penalty, disputing claims of mental incompetence put forth by his attorneys.

Case Background

Joseph Corcoran was convicted of fatally shooting his brother James Corcoran, his sister’s fiancé Robert Scott Turner, and their friends Timothy Bricker and Douglas Stillwell. The killings, which occurred over 25 years ago, led to his death sentence, which is now scheduled to be carried out on Dec. 18, 2024.

Mental Health Defense

Corcoran has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, with documented delusions, including claims that prison guards torture him with sound waves and that he converses with imaginary figures. His attorneys argue these delusions render him incompetent for execution under the precedent set by the 1986 Supreme Court ruling in Ford v. Wainwright, which prohibits executing individuals deemed mentally incompetent.

State’s Argument

In a filing on Tuesday, the Attorney General’s Office contended that Corcoran’s attorneys have failed to substantiate claims of his incompetence.

Presumption of Competence: The state asserts that Corcoran is presumed sane and competent for execution unless proven otherwise.
Refutation of Delusions: The filing cites letters from Corcoran in which he admitted fabricating stories about prison torment. In one 2000 letter, Corcoran wrote, “I made up a story that the prison is tormenting me with ultrasound.”
Desire for Execution: The state highlighted Corcoran’s past letters expressing acceptance of his death sentence. A 2006 letter indicated that Corcoran viewed execution as a preferable “escape” compared to a lifetime in prison.

Questions of Representation

The state also pointed to procedural concerns, noting that petitions filed by Corcoran’s attorneys lacked his signature. They argue this omission raises doubts about whether Corcoran endorses their efforts to spare his life.